Categories
creative essays revelation

Religion Over Science. Triumphant.

There is a fatal flaw in science. It is the fact that the best that a scientific approach can accomplish is to rule out hypotheses, one after another. The flaw is that you can think up another 100 or 1,000 possible explanations for any given phenomenon. There is no way to test them all.

You can never truly be certain that your theory is absolutely the best fit for the evidence, even after extensive testing, as long as a multitude of hypotheses remain untested and in theory.

On the other hand, I believe that revelation knowledge, as received by the ancient prophets and holy men, is truly the highest and most reliable form of knowledge.

Science can never deliver the certainty that a metaphysical revelation can, and what you see as science’s greatest asset, is also its greatest weakness– that any idea can be invalidated by new information. For example, it is common today to find people using science to expose science. They are working within the margins of that uncertainty, planting their ideas there, fortifying their positions with research, and standing their ground. Two men argue a point, and both have surveys and studies to back up their arguments. They bonk each over the head with opposing studies and cite from journals and research projects. They invalidate the studies that their opponent cites from by critically examining it for errors and missed hypotheticals. They both often succeed at this purpose, and no winner is declared.

And so what is the answer?

Wisdom through personal revelation. Which should be sought after through meditation on ancient scripture.

Even great scientific achievements start with a remarkable idea. An idea that seems to explain everything at once. All of the pieces fall into place, and it seems to answer all of the objections and challenges.

This is revelation.

Revelation is a windfall of understanding. It is the sudden reception of a grand, unifying idea that has great explanatory power and reach. It is like the arrival, whole cloth, of a complete body of knowledge. It feels as if the truth has been deposited into you from on high.

It seems to come out of the ether, but it really doesn’t. It often comes out the other end of a long train of thinking deeply about certain problems and unanswered questions. It comes from a commitment to truth, to what is right, no matter where that might lead.

Because once you marry yourself to truth, you open yourself up to personal revelation. This happens because you are seeing all of the contributing environmental factors with perfect clarity, and not through the warped lens of the ego, or through the glazed screen of emotions. You have left yourself exposed to the harsh and brutal elements, and only in this dangerous world can you find dangerous truths. Truths that Christ discovered, that made men who lived in their world of uncertainty and lies to seek to kill him, to censor him, to shut him up for good.

This kind of revelation comes when you only seek what is right. When you focus on morality, you are really focusing on truth. Whatever is true is right. True-ness is rightness. And so you are left wide open, as it were, to undiluted injections of truth, because you aren’t predisposed toward anything but the pursuit of truth. There are no blockades, political– emotional or moral, even.

Revelations are experiences, in fact. They come out of an accumulation of thousands of previous meditation points. They are, in fact, the end-result of a kind of large-scale experiential survey of various intellectual experiences. They are published, more so than received. Through the spirit and into the mind.

But you have to believe, at bottom, that the pursuit of philosophy is a more noble and enriching pursuit than that of science. You have to believe that it is better to be wise than smart. You have to believe that applied knowledge is better than knowledge for knowledge’s sake.

In the end, you cannot just remove the human influence from the scientific ideal and deify it, as many do today. Science is and always will be poisoned by the human influence until we can hand it over to AI.

To ignore wisdom is stupid. Thinkers, metaphysicians, priests, scholars and prophets have laid a groundwork of two thousand plus years of revelation, epiphany and spiritual and philosophical insight. The moral guidelines they have patiently and carefully constructed and worked out have served humanity well for millennia. In fact, you can make a strong case that we would not have survived as a species without them.

And finally, religion is more important than science to society itself. Because in order for a society to survive and succeed, they must find common ground in similar and shared morals. Science is great for engineering, for aerodynamics, for moving about large stones or building large structures or developing medicines. But there is a dark, blind spot, and this spot can be found at the intersection between faith and fear. Because there are some bridges that scientific thought cannot cross.

The fact is that religion becomes most valuable at the exact moment when the cost for doing right starts to become unreasonable. And without men willing to go the extra mile for what is right and good, society would devolve and collapse without religion’s essential superstructure.

The thing with science, also, is that if you are willing to hold an idea until new evidence comes along, then it is pretty obvious that the nature of your thought process isn’t to ‘find truth.’ Because truth is truth. It is not open to dismissal or being changed through a presentation of new evidence.

Also, I’ve noticed, that every time someone gives an example of ‘science proving truth,’ it amounts to something equivalent to common sense, not something that necessarily deserves scientific scrutiny.

A revelation, on the other hand, takes a mystery, solves it, and makes it as if it was always there, right in your face, just common sense, but for whatever reason, you couldn’t see it. But aha! Why couldn’t I see this before? It explains EVERYTHING.

I think many today have married metaphysical ideas with scientific ones. And so you see the inaccurate language, where science ‘leads to truth.’ But I believe that this marriage cannot work. Philosophy and science are not friendly bedfellows, but are sworn enemies.

I have said it before, but the only hope for mankind is a great falling away from science, and a re-commitment to the natural art of thinking and doing philosophy, which is accessible to every man. Science is, and has been an occupation for elitists. The scientific establishment has long been hostile to the common man and the wisdom he has accumulated from philosophy, metaphysics, and personal revelation.

Without the hostile takeover of the man of ruler and beaker, we might have continued on our natural progression of accumulating wisdom. Maybe by now, a singularity would have been reached, or a tipping point in the spiritual struggle between good and evil. But instead, we are on the verge of annihilation, under the threat of extinction at every passing moment.

Lockdowns. Political extremism. Mystery viruses. The threat of nuclear annihilation.

Maybe it is time we stop pretending that philosophy is science in other words. It is not. Only one can give us wisdom, which is what the world really needs more than anything right now.

And anyway, science today is vulnerable. It is vulnerable because we are now presented with the opinions of scientists and sold these opinions as science itself, by the media and political mouthpieces. Their opinions may or may not be informed, but they are still opinions, and they are not scientific results.

And of course, I am not completely dismissing science. Science is a useful tool for getting stuff done, and in more efficient ways than we previously could. It is a great utility. But if we are to survive the self-destructive rage of our own nature, we need something more valuable, and that is moral revelation.

Maybe, we should take our minds off the training wheels.

Personal revelation, or epiphany, is what we should be seeking. It is a windfall of knowledge that connects all of the dots.

It is when an idea takes a saltational leap and suddenly becomes apparent, and as clear as something considered to be common sense.

To me, this all seems like common sense.

Categories
creative essays Uncategorized

Hell Isn’t a Problem.

I don’t know whether I believe in hell or not, honestly. But I do believe that God is just. God is fair. God is love. I trust his judgments will be fair and just and right.

If you asked me to defend the idea of hell, I’d say that I think God doesn’t want anyone to go to hell. I think humans do, though. Humanity demands justice of God night and day. I think if God did not create a place like hell, we would demand that he does.

All you have to do is look around at all of our crowded jails and prisons. Or look at the number of people on death row. Or look into the hearts of those who have had their loved ones taken away by a murderer, a rapist, a child molester, despot or drunk driver or so on. I don’t know why people have trouble with the idea– it is a human idea if there ever was one.

You can find the idea, and the longing for such a terrible place– in the heart of man.

Who has never read the news of a terrible murder and not demanded justice ‘of whatever gods may be?’ Imagine a hypothetical godless person. Also a nihilist. Someone who believes that morality is for the birds, so to say. So this man cheats and lies and steals and murders and plunders, doing whatever he thinks he can get away with it– when he thinks nobody is looking.

God isn’t looking. God doesn’t exist. Nobody sees me, anyway.

If he were allowed total annihilation at death, would not his whole philosophy of life have been justified?

Was he not “right” to live this way?

Would that be justice?

I also think you can also make a case that hell is a natural byproduct of the human yearning for eternal life. We all long to live forever, to never die.

Hell could be the other side of that coin. If we look into our souls, we may find the answers. We may be judged one day and obscenely question God about hell, and He may laugh and rip open the human soul and show us that heaven and hell were demands made nightly ON HIM; that it was humanity who demanded of him eternal modes of bliss and punishment. And that hell was originally created for the devil and his angels.

Maybe he would allow us to hear the desperate pleas for justice, for retribution, for comeuppance that he is inundated with nightly by his earthly children.

Finally, hell is simply a human demand on God. The proof of it? Even if you believe that God does not exist, you still have to recognize that billions of people believe in hell. Hell is an all-too-human belief, and a deep and powerful yearning for eternal and divine justice common to all in every society, in every era and epoch.

Someone who doesn’t possess that longing for divine justice is the anomaly, and the freak. Not the hundreds of millions that do.

Categories
creative essays faith revelation Uncategorized

Faith comes Through Revelation

I’ve been thinking about what faith really is for over 20 years now. The other night, just being in bed, I received a revelation that furthered my understanding on this topic.

We have been told that faith is so many things. We have been told that it is a spiritual force. We have been told that it is a spiritual law, and that it works much like any physical, natural law. But I’ve never felt that those ideas were quite right. I fear they treat God as a kind of push-button God, who reflexively responds to faith on demand. Somehow, I don’t think that God is like a computer program, where if you punch in the right code, He does what you want Him to do. It reduces God to the status of a tool, and that just can’t be right.

Immediately, a few verses came to mind.

In Ephesians 2:8, the bible states that we are saved by faith, and that it is the “gift of God.” And in Romans 12:3, Paul indicates that a “measure” of faith is assigned to all believers. And in 1 Corinthians 12:9, faith is said to be a spiritual gifting.

Finally, we find that “faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.”

So, why? Why does faith come from hearing the bible?

I realized that faith comes by revelation, through an epiphany, that comes by meditating on the gospel or God’s ways.

Of course. Because the christian walk itself starts with a realization, that we need God and His ways in our lives, or that we are sinful, or that Christ is the messiah.

So, I realized that faith is not some ethereal force or some mechanical spiritual law or principle, but just a gifting of revealed knowledge. It comes through revelation.

And revelation is just a windfall of understanding. It is that “aha” moment of sudden and impactful realization. And it is always personal, always a moment of awakening.

That is why it is critical to hear the Word, to speak the Word, to be around the Word, to think on and meditate on the Word. The Word is your source of personal revelation, which really are just gifts of faith.

When God speaks to you, or reveals something to you, in His own voice and through His own Words, you come to recognize God. You come to develop faith in His voice and in His word by constantly encountering Him over and over. This is how relationships are built. This is how trust and confidence are gained. This is how faith works.

Categories
creative essays racism revelation Uncategorized

If You Hate Just One, You Hate All.

This is one of those sayings that is really hard to get a personal revelation of, to actually appreciate in a deep way. I had heard it preached over and over, but just didn’t want to agree with it. I resisted it. I fought it. I argued and wrestled with this premise for months and months.

But I think I am starting to turn toward it with an attitude of acceptance.

Here’s why.

Jesus died for the world. For everybody.

“For God so loved THE WORLD,” and all of that.

He didn’t just die for you, or for me, or the church, or his disciples. He died for the world.

Yes. That same world whose influence we are commanded to protect our souls against. That world.

To make the point more emphatic, in that famous verse in the third chapter of the gospel of John, it goes on to say that “whosoever believeth in him has eternal life.”

Whosoever. Which means that person who dogged us, who betrayed us, who screwed us over. Yes. That whosoever.

But let’s switch this up. Let’s imagine that God hates a man.

Let’s imagine that God thinks of this man and it just burns him up to do so. Just the thought of this man makes him irate, causes him to lose sleep, and will ruin his whole day.

Sounds absolutely ridiculous, right?

God does not respect any man enough to hate on him.

If he did, we would certainly look suspiciously on God.

And yet, as followers of God and His ways, we instinctively assume it is okay to hate people. We automatically assume that it is okay to hate ANYONE.

But, this is probably not so. It is not okay.

So, if you hate just one, you have no love in your heart for anybody.

The idea is not so crazy.

I had a realization many years ago that all of us were like branches on the same genetic tree. It is said that we share 99.8% of the same genetic material.

From a scientific perspective, we are all clones.

The physical differences between two people are marginal.

In some ways, to hate someone else is to hate yourself. You hate someone who is almost genetically identical to you.

Think about that for a second.

Let me add one more point.

Jesus didn’t just teach that we were all sinners. Jesus didn’t just teach that we were all imperfect.

Jesus taught that we were all pretty much in open rebellion against God and His ways.

Jesus taught that if you looked upon a woman with lust in your heart, you already committed adultery. You are an adulterer, worthy of death.

If you look at a person with violent hatred in your heart, you have already committed murder. You are a murderer.

Paul went as far as to say that it is not our job to judge those outside of the church, at all.

Finally, we have all heard the phrase: “hate the sin, but not the sinner.

Probably better to hate your own sin, I say.

You cannot hate another’s sin and not hate your own.

You cannot hate one sinner without hating them all.

Hatred for one’s neighbor is as good as hating yourself. Scientifically. Biologically. And spiritually.
That’s why Jesus commanded us to not only love our neighbor, but our enemies, as well. Because, as we all know, our greatest enemy is always ourselves.

Categories
creative essays politics revelation Uncategorized

The Most Important Blog Post I Might Ever Write

Laying in bed the other night, my mind was swirling. I was thinking about a verse that has served as a lens through which I am now filtering reality in some way:

For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. – Ephesians 6:12

I thought of the current political environment in America, how the lines are clearly drawn between left and right, christian and godless, Northerner and Southerner.

I wondered if there was a hidden determinant to all of this conflict, if the sides were equally drawn on the spiritual plane, as it were.

What if, since 65% of the citizenry identifies as Christian, the opposition to church outreach services and charities, is really just an anti-church movement in disguise? What if their unyielding promotion of state and government services for the poor is all about taking social influence away from the church and moving it over to themselves?

What if the idea that the government must take care of its citizenry like a parent does a young child is just the design of a godless institution competing vigorously against the influence of the church for the souls of men?

What if the movement to tax the middle and upper classes is likewise an anti-christian movement, as most millionaires identify as Christian? What if it designed to defund and defang the church by stressing its main funding sources to the point of breaking? What if it is akin to a religious tax that targets a protected minority, much like some Muslim-majority countries institute an abusive Jyzya tax on Christians living in their lands?

What if faith is the most important ingredient in the recipe for the making and maintaining of a free nation? What if the willingness to die for what is right and moral and just in the face of tyranny is the one thing that the authoritarian state must overcome in order to emasculate its citizenry, making them fearful, robotic conformists–impotent and flinching at its immense authority?

What if democratic, secular leftism is really, actually anti-christian sentiment and bias wrapped up in a political sophistry, much like the bible says of the devil, that he comes disguised as an angel of light? What if the road to hell truly is paved with good intentions? What if the road to hell is really paved with our own, all-so-human intentions?

What if the political lines, having been drawn, and then apprehended, really show a clear dividing line between good and evil, with no in between, no wriggle room.

It is a hard place to go, difficult to digest, distasteful in the mouth, even. Even the most fallible of Christians might find themselves rebuking these thoughts as too extreme, just all too much.

Even worse than all of that, speaking as a protestant Christian, what if the breakaway protestant church has been the main contributor to this societal divide, allowing disparate doctrine to be taught from one church to another, genetically distinct from traditional and authoritative christian ideologies? What if you lived in a country where, if you wished, you could easily find a church that is pro-choice, supports censorship of their neighbors in their community, and where its members hold no political or moral beliefs that distinguish themselves from the godless masses?

Isn’t Protestant America such a place?

What if the church’s ‘anti-gay’ beliefs are really pro-gay, pro-mental-health, pro-human, and like Jesus said: ‘the sabbath day of rest was made FOR MAN’S own good.’ What if modern-day views about racism and hate speech are not sins, and never were, because they are not consistent moral constructions? What if they are just secular, counterfeit euphemisms for evil? What if this alternative moral code being taught to our children is just a ruse to get them to take their eyes off of the time-tested dichotomy of good and evil and instead take the shiny, appealing apple of their own moral fruits to their mouths?

What if school lock downs are anti-christian in nature, as most people having children and having large families are Christian, and lock downs only serve to financially devastate the nuclear Christian family?

What if this is truly a spiritual war, a struggle against dark principalities and evil forces?

These are questions that I don’t think any Christian should sleep on.